The two faces of Downy Woodpecker

    → Last Updated on

A few species of birds with false eyespots are well-known: pygmy-owls and American Kestrel come to mind. In these species of birds, spots on the back of the head produce the illusion of eyes, and create what is called deflective (or parasematic) coloration. Deflective coloration is defined as patterns which “produce the impression of a head at the wrong end” and “characters which misdirect the attack of enemies by misrepresenting the posture of their prey” (Cott, 1940). William Clay (1953) wrote about deflective coloration in the American Kestrel, and shows how the head markings of that species create false faces on the back and on each side of the head.

The advantages of these confusing false faces are clear. All predators rely on surprise to capture their prey, so if a predator is coming in for the attack and thinks it is being watched, it might give up on the attack, or try to maneuver around to the other side so it can approach unseen. At the least it might hesitate or change the angle of its attack and give the prey a split-second longer to see it approaching.

Our brains are wired to perceive faces at the slightest suggestion, as this article in the New York Times describes, and we can also see faces of other species. There’s no reason to think that other animals are any less adept at turning vague patterns into faces.

Check out this image of a Downy Woodpecker – is it looking towards you or away?

Downy Woodpecker, Concord, MA, edited photo copyright David Sibley.

The false face on the back of the head of this Downy Woodpecker is fairly obvious. I altered the photo slightly to simplify and enhance the patterns that were already there. Below is an unaltered photo (video frame) of the same bird:

Downy Woodpecker, Concord, MA. Photo copyright David Sibley.

The false face, like any illusion, comes and goes as your perception shifts, but it should be enough to give a predator second thoughts about approaching from this side. The illusion of a face is most convincing when we are looking directly at the back of the head (when the bird is looking directly away) and this, not coincidentally, is the angle at which the bird is least likely to see an approaching predator and therefore is most vulnerable.

I’ve seen similar false faces and presumed deflective coloration on many other species of birds over the years, but this has been essentially unstudied by biologists, from what I can find. A few studies of insects, molluscs, reptiles and amphibians (examples Kamoun 1991 and a review by Cooper 1998) suggest that eyespots and/or display movements confuse predators at the moment of attack and direct them to attack a more expendable part of the prey, such as a tail. The more passive role of false faces that I propose here – preventing attack by making predators think they’re being watched – seems to have received very little attention, but I think it is widespread in birds.

References

Clay, W. M. 1953. Protective Coloration in the American Sparrow Hawk. Wilson Bull. 65:129-134. pdf here

Cooper, W. E. Jr. 1998. Conditions favoring anticipatory and reactive displays deflecting predatory attack. Behavioral Ecology. Vol. 9: 598-604. pdf here

Cott, H. B. 1940. Adaptive coloration in animals. Oxford University Press, New York.

Kamoun, S. 1991. Parasematic Coloration: a novel anti-predator mechanism in Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 45: 15-19. abstract here

6 thoughts on “The two faces of Downy Woodpecker”

  1. Interesting hypothesis; just difficult to know if what might appear ‘facial-like’ to us appears so to a predator. And in calling this “widespread” just curious what other common birds you might cite as examples?
    At any rate, seems like something a resourceful grad student could pretty readily do some initial study of if so inclined.

  2. Hi cyberthrush, I agree, we don’t know if the predators perceive these as faces. I’m confident that they do, and I think they probably perceive even more subtle things as faces, but for now it’s all speculation. I think it would make a great research project. A few examples of other species would be several other woodpeckers, Cooper’s Hawk, Northern Hawk Owl, and Scaly-naped Pigeon. I’ll try to put together a follow-up post on some of those species.

  3. Hi David

    Another species is Sharp-shinned Hawk. I have a slide from some years ago where a feeding Sharp-shinned with it’s back to me shows very distinctly two light spots for psuedo eyes and the wings extending back make the whole “face” quite realistic.

    Also, I have been mildly interested in the nape pattern on Hairy and Downy Woodpeckers. On some adult females the dark crown extends down the nape forming a bar separating the two white superciliaries, while on others the superciliaries join at the nape with no break. When these birds freeze on a branch during a predator alert they hunch up slightly making the effect even more convincing.

    Chuck

    1. Hi Chuck,
      Thanks! I’ve seen the same thing a few times on Sharp-shinned Hawk, and I’ll try to post about that. I had never considered the possibility that these patterns could be enhanced by posture, but as you say these birds do adopt a standardized “predator-alert” posture, and it would make sense to have the false face pattern most obvious at that time. Another thing to watch for!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.