There are four named subspecies of Scaled Quail, three in the US and one in Mexico. The subspecies found in southern Texas is distinctly different from the other three, at least in adult male plumage, and makes the list of field identifiable subspecies. Here’s a quick summary of the differences, based on study of specimens at Harvard’s MCZ, and numerous photos. Some field testing is needed, and figuring out where (and how much) the subspecies intergrade is important. No difference in voice has ever been mentioned, but that’s worth checking out.
Basically, any bird with a chestnut belly is safely identified as the south Texas subspecies castanogastris. Birds without a chestnut belly could be another subspecies, or females or immatures of castanogastris, and you’ll have to look at other details to identify them. Vagrants are unlikely to occur, so range will be a reliable clue to identification, but in order to work out the range we’ll have to identify a lot of birds…
Males differ very slightly in overall color and darkness, probably not enough to be useful in the field except in direct comparison (which is unlikely to happen in the wild). Identification will have to be based on the color of the belly and undertail coverts.
Males: southern Texas vs Arizona-New Mexico
- center of lower belly with dark chestnut or maroon-brown patch, may be small or irregular (vs center of belly pale buff)
- belly surrounding chestnut patch tinged strongly orange-buff, fading to cream-buff outwards (vs slightly orange-buff in center of belly where TX birds have chestnut, fading to off-white outwards)
- undertail coverts with dark brownish markings, washed orange-brown to rust (vs paler gray-brown markings with cream-colored edges)
- neck and breast darker gray, forming distinct gray breastband
- crown and cheeks grayer and darker (vs ashy brown)
- slightly darker overall
- slightly darker and more brownish on back
- tail darker gray above
- throat slightly darker and more orange-brown
Females differ very slightly in overall color similar to male but less obvious, and south Texas females don’t really show any trace of the chestnut belly patch, so the best field mark for males is not useful on females. They do seem to show a difference in throat pattern.
Females: southern Texas vs Arizona-New Mexico
- throat distinctly streaked (vs smooth pale buff-gray)
- belly and under tail coverts slightly more orange toned
- breast and neck very slightly darker
- upperparts darker and warmer brown, especiaily on scapulars and upper tail coverts
3 thoughts on “Subspecies of Scaled Quail”
Fantastic post; as to intergrades:
In Birds of Coahuila by E. K. Urban (1959) he states that “In northeastern Coahuila pallida seems to intergrade with castanogastris”.
Your drawing reflects Brewster in his original description where he said “all (Arizona & New Mexico birds) are very much paler than my types of C. castanogastris (from Rio Grande City Texas) while in none of them is there any decided chestnut patch beneath, the nearest approaches showing only a slight rusty tipping on a few of the feathers.”.
Thanks Mark. I just checked Oberholser’s Bird Life of Texas and he puts the northern limit of castanogastris in Texas at Maverick County (Eagle Pass), “rarely north to” Edwards County (Rocksprings) and Bexar County (San Antonio), but pallida might be rare that far east. In that case the place to look for intergrades in Texas would be between Eagle Pass and Del Rio along the Rio Grande, and in the adjacent southern edge of the Edwards Plateau. It’s likely that there is a much longer intergrade zone in Mexico, but I don’t know if anyone birds in that region. On the other hand, the map at NatureServe shows a gap in the Mexican range that looks like it would separate castanogastris in the east from pallida-types in the west, except for the state of Coahuila. So intergradation might not be much more extensive in Mexico than it is in Texas.
My Family Ranch in NE Zapata County in South Texas definitely has the Blue Quail with the chestnut belly. Beautiful game birds. I never realized that they were a subspecies. Great article. Very informative!