See my detailed discussion of White-crowned subspecies here, which needs updating with the information below.
In early May 2011 I spent several days in southeastern Arizona, and devoted a lot of time to studying the White-crowned Sparrows. At that date most of them were migrant Interior West birds of subspecies Z. l. oriantha. Most of the local wintering population of Western Taiga subspecies Z. l. gambelii had already migrated north, but a few were still present and offered excellent comparisons. On 1 May I watched and photographed a few dozen birds at the San Pedro House feeders, and discovered a number of differences (details and photos below).
The Interior West subspecies oriantha has sometimes been considered the same subspecies as the Eastern Taiga leucophrys, because they were thought to be indistinguishable by appearance, but lumping them makes no sense biogeographically. My study of these birds revealed (as I suspected) that the Interior West birds differ in a number of subtle but significant ways from the Western Taiga birds. In contrast, Eastern Taiga birds have always struck me as simply dark-lored1 and pink-billed versions of Western Taiga. So presumably all of the differences noted here (aside from bill color and lore color) should work to distinguish Interior West from Eastern Taiga, but that remains to be tested.
Interior West oriantha vs Western Taiga gambelii
- lores blackish (vs pale gray)
Some variation in Interior West birds involves pale gray invading from below, and may represent intergradation.
- bill pinkish tinged orange, often with dusky wash and culmen (vs bill orange tinged pink, usually paler and cleaner)
This is surprisingly difficult to ascertain. Similar to the Greater White-fronted Goose subspecies problem, an orange-billed bird stands out among a group of pink bills, but then scanning and trying to quickly sort birds on bill color is impossible, and judging bill color on a lone bird is difficult.
- more obvious and broader white throat area extending onto malar on Interior West (vs. more restricted pale area forming a relatively narrow and inconspicuous pale patch when viewed from front)
This is fairly obvious when comparing the two subspecies side by side, but probably much more difficult to judge in isolation.
- cleaner gray nape with broad gray streaks merging into upper back on Interior West (vs brown streaks on nape and upper back forming sharp boundary between gray nape and brown-streaked back)
- larger white tips on wing coverts
- overall larger and bulkier
- richer reddish-brown edges on tertials (vs. paler reddish-brown)
- dark streaks on back richer reddish-brown (vs dark dusky brown and blackish)
- lateral crown stripes broader in front and narrower to rear (vs more uniform width throughout)
- crown averages brighter, almost all have very bright white crown including eyebrow that wraps around back of head (vs median crown stripe and eyebrow become gray before end of black stripes)
Photos don’t show this very well, but it was obvious in the field. Females have distinctly drabber crown patterns than males, and it’s possible that the few remaining Western Taiga birds in this location were all females. This deserves more study.
- crown often raised, bushy (vs usually held flat)
This behavioral difference could be sex-related as in the previous feature
- It is worth noting that the term “lores” is used loosely here, the color difference in these sparrows is largely above the lores, on the supraloral, but it’s easier and at least partly correct to call it the lores. [↩]